![]() |
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| {Mac} : Cleaning Inquiries regarding TuneUp Companion's 'Cleaning' feature (as well as Analyze and Undo) |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7
|
i'm on a macbook pro, 2.4GHz dual core with 4GB ram and when i rune tuneup, it is consistently using 70-80% of my CPU, even when i'm not cleaning anything (i.e. it's idle and no music is playing). over time, tuneup uses more CPU than most all of my other applications combined. is there a way this can be brought down or throttled some? there is a noticeable decrease in response time when tuneup is running, and i'm having to quit the application just to regain responsiveness.
any help would be greatly appreciated! thanks, randy |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 670
|
Hi Randy,
On first run, TuneUp parses your entire collection for missing cover art (for the Cover Art tab). Once this initial run through is complete, TuneUp should use less tan 5% of your CPU while idling. How big is your music collection? One thing you can try is leaving TuneUp on overnight to let it run through the collection. Once the initial run through is complete, the results are cached until you hit the "refresh" button on the Cover Art tab. We've already modified TuneUp's "startup routine" on the PC and we're bringing synchronicity to the Mac with each update. Please post back with the results of the "overnight run" ![]() Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7
|
Stephen,
Thanks for getting back to me. I currently have ~30k songs in my library and have been "cleaning" them in batches of 30-50 at a time. With that, I've noticed some other odd behaviors, but I'll come back to those. I currently have TuneUp running, but it is not cleaning any files. I've had it & itunes open for several hours now. I have had TuneUp running for days at a time with no changes. I just ran top and this is what I'm getting for current CPU usage: Code:
Processes: 123 total, 3 running, 3 stuck, 117 sleeping... 601 threads 20:59:39 Load Avg: 1.55, 1.66, 1.56 CPU usage: 42.74% user, 20.94% sys, 36.32% idle SharedLibs: num = 6, resident = 44M code, 4368K data, 3500K linkedit. MemRegions: num = 33208, resident = 1617M + 31M private, 301M shared. PhysMem: 640M wired, 2147M active, 1138M inactive, 3916M used, 180M free. VM: 24G + 361M 621701(0) pageins, 395385(0) pageouts PID COMMAND %CPU TIME #TH #PRTS #MREGS RPRVT RSHRD RSIZE VSIZE 51344 TuneUp 21.3% 2:05:23 8 235 2410 152M- 27M- 195M 786M As for the other issues, please let me know if I should start a new thread: - occasionally, when a song is in multiple albums (i.e. the original album, various collection albums, best of albums, soundtracks, etc.), TuneUp seems to take one of the collection albums rather than the original album (my personal preference). this is especially frustrating when trying to clean part of the original album and most of the songs are identified correctly but several are instead identified as part of a collection. clearing those songs and cleaning them again will sometimes show a different album. - occasionally, even after choosing from one of the 4 options, a random album cover will be downloaded and put on the songs. usually this is another picture from one of the other songs i recently cleaned leading me to believe it might be a caching issue. - while this is more of a feature request, i would really like the ability to choose between possible albums when it is not clear which a song belongs to. taking more clues from other songs being manually cleaned at that time might be a good way to prioritize. thanks! randy |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 670
|
Hey Randy,
No problem! First let's cover the "other" questions: Quote:
We're working on how to best implement it and it's definitely on our roadmap. Quote:
I think this is similar to the first request...we're working to improve how we group artists / tracks / albums. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 670
|
In regards to the CPU usage, I just launched TuneUp and I was around 25-30% during the launch.
Once TuneUp was loaded (and idle) Code:
13108 TuneUp 13.4% 1:44.93 8 116 592 25M 14M 45M 281M 12859 iTunes 0.1% 1:07.37 21 363+ 677 26M 40M 53M 359M Is TuneUp locking up your machine when idling? Or when processing? Both? TuneUp actually shouldn't ever lock up your machine (even while cleaning). Your machine will probably run slower while cleaning (much like encoding video) but you shouldn't ever be forced to hard reboot. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7
|
Stephen,
Thanks for the threads on the multiple albums issue, I look forward to the continued development! My machine never locks up when TuneUp is idling, but it does hover around 20% CPU usage, even when it's doing nothing. I understand and expect the jump when cleaning (with the glimmerblocker, I've even been impressed with the variety of websites you guys check for album art). It's not a show-stopping issue, but I am concerned that it's taking so much processor when idling. Not sure how important this is, but I'm on 10.5.6. Thanks! Randy |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 670
|
Hi Randy,
I just spoke to one of our mac developers and he said that the CPU idling usage is a known issue that he's actually currently working on. For now, CPU usage at around 15-25% is normal for TuneUp depending on the size of the collection when idling. Future versions will bring this idle usage down, but the primary focus on mac is making sure that all the features that are currently implemented on the PC are implemented on the Mac ASAP. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1
|
TuneUp now sits at 40% of a core, and did not do that last version
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|